I replied, \u201cI\u2019m William Dever.\u201d So what? Perhaps Hershel thought that I should recognize the name. After all, he had published in magazines like Commentary<\/em>. And, besides being an attorney in a prominent law firm, he had published a well-regarded biography of Judge Learned Hand.<\/p>\n I invited Hershel in, and he told me that he was on a year\u2019s sabbatical in Jerusalem. He had already written an account of ongoing archaeological discoveries in Jerusalem. He further informed me that he was going to launch a popular magazine to report on new discoveries that would illuminate the Bible and attract the attention of a large audience in the United States. I remember telling Hershel that no amateur could possibly understand and interpret the then-burgeoning and complex archaeological research in Israel in any sensible way. Boy, was I wrong!<\/p>\n Hershel\u2019s family and ours got acquainted, socialized, and toured some that year. I recall seeing the first, modest issue of BAR<\/strong> later. I disliked Hershel\u2019s penchant for controversy (somewhat refined in due time). Nevertheless, I did serve on his Editorial Board off and on, resigning several times when we differed on various issues or when I thought he was using my name to stir the pot. (One article by Hershel was titled \u201cDever\u2019s \u2018Sermon on the Mound<\/a>.\u2019\u201d)<\/p>\n Hershel and I have argued a lot over the past 40-odd years. In retrospect, we both must have enjoyed it, and we came to respect each other for our differing but significant contributions to the enterprise that we both loved so much. What\u2019s not to like? Israel, the Bible, and archaeology!<\/p>\n One could point to Hershel\u2019s use of the growing BAR<\/strong> platform to promote various causes, such as the need to publish the Dead Sea Scrolls. His tactic was always to overdramatize the topic and try to marshal public attention to pressure scholars (which usually worked). Then he would turn to a new, perhaps even more sensational issue. I recall saying once, \u201cHershel, get into epistemology. That\u2019s the next big thing.\u201d<\/p>\n Without blinking an eye, he replied, \u201cOk, but what\u2019ll I use for illustrations?\u201d Hershel has always had a great sense of humor, an appreciation for words, for pictures, and for the public\u2019s thirst for news and novelty.<\/p>\n Much more important than Hershel\u2019s numerous individual campaigns was his uncanny understanding of the American public\u2019s endless fascination with old-fashioned \u201cbiblical archaeology.\u201d And that was at the very time when many of us professionals were trying to separate the two disciplines of archaeology and biblical studies. Our purpose, of course, was to create a more serious dialogue, to move beyond the old amateur and sterile monologue. In time, we professionals accomplished our agenda, at least in part. But Hershel also accomplished his agenda. And he did it brilliantly, popularizing our complex excavations and esoteric research for a mass audience that we scholars could never have reached. Unfortunately, many professionals don\u2019t even try to do that. Simply put, Hershel and BAR<\/strong> have mainstreamed what is variously called \u201cbiblical,\u201d \u201cSyro-Palestinian,\u201d or now often \u201cLevantine\u201d archaeology. That must be recognized as a unique and invaluable achievement. And all along, it was Hershel\u2019s unwavering and sometimes obstreperous vision.<\/p>\n It is hard to imagine our two disciplines as they matured, or our enhanced understanding of the Bible, without the profound effect that BAR<\/strong> has had under Hershel Shanks\u2019s editorship. And I cannot imagine a successor who will put his unique stamp on the magazine as Hershel did.<\/p>\n \u2014<\/p>\n We have collected reflections on Hershel\u2019s legacy from some of his colleagues and dear friends. Many of these originally appeared in Festschrift: A Celebration of Hershel Shanks<\/a>, the special double issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, published in 2018. Please enjoy these memories and celebrate Hershel\u2019s contributions to the fields of biblical archaeology and biblical studies.<\/em><\/p>\n By William G. Dever I\u2019m one of the few people who can say they knew Hershel Shanks and BAR before they both became famous. In […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":53,"featured_media":56900,"parent":65267,"menu_order":9,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-template\/obituary.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-65318","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.biblicalarchaeology.org\/wp-content\/smush-avif\/2019\/01\/william-dever-232x300.jpg.avif\")
William G. Dever<\/strong>\u202fis a Professor Emeritus of Near Eastern Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Arizona. Prior to that, he served for four years as director of the American School of Oriental Research in Jerusalem (now the William F. Albright Institute of Archaeological Research). A world-renowned archaeologist, Professor Dever has dug at numerous sites in Jordan and Israel. He served as director of the major excavations at Gezer from 1966 to 1971.<\/p>\n