Actually, Hebrew was rarely spoken, let alone written by the 1st C CE. They spoke Aramaic and, having been thoroughly helenised, wrote in Greek, probably their second language. For more information, read Barbara Thiering’s books, even if you do not believe in her conclusions.

How many times did Jesus call himself the Son of Man? Could he have been more explicit?

Dufu. If only you would take the time to really study you would see how misguided your comment is. The only truly pure inspired text is the original manuscripts (Called autographs). All others are translations. They need to be studied. If the oldest’s and bests manuscripts differ from modern bibles we say that they do.
Could you be blinded by a hatred of Christianity?
There are only a handful of Christian Denominations- all others are either slightly different versions of a major one or they are heretical false denominations of Christianity.

Dufu. If only you would take the time to really study you would see how false you comment is. The only truly pure inspired text is the original manuscripts (Called autographs). All others are translations. They need to be studied. If the oldest’s and bests manuscripts differ from modern bibles we say that they do.
If you weren’t blinded by your hatred of Christianity you could see that. there are only a handful of Christian Denominations- all others are either slightly different versions of a major one or they are heretical false denominations of Christianity.

If only you would take the time to really study you would see how false you comment is. The only truly pure inspired text is the original manuscripts (Called autographs). All others are translations. They need to be studied. If the oldest’s and bests manuscripts differ from modern bibles we say that they do.
If you weren’t blinded by your hatred of Christianity you could see that. there are only a handful of Christian Denominations- all others are either slightly different versions of a major one or they are heretical false denominations of Christianity.

Yes, exactly, I would much prefer a translation from a competent non-believer. Unfortunately I’m not aware of any for the New Testament.

Peter, if scholars expect people to accept their claim of 4th century origin for Sinaiticus they should provide Carbon 14 dating to prove as a minimum that the parchment is that old. Dr. Brent Nongri has stated that Carbon 14 dating hasn’t been done for either Sinaiticus or Vaticanus. Let’s get this evidence then see where that leads to. In my view there’s no support for their 4th century claims without proof from Carbon 14 tests.

There can not be true HOLY SPIRIT unity at the expense of truth

This is not true. 1 Chr 19 starts from 1-17 and literally skips every chapter all the way to Ezra 9:9 in the manuscript. Then scribe 1 sees his mistake but can’t go back. so he just starts writing 1 Chr 19:18 through Ezra 9:9 where he remembers. This shows you that there was only one translator. This is not a true manuscript as this manuscript has to many mistakes.